Sunday 30 April 2017

Another Example of False Statements by LA County DCFS CSW Christie Parkin

Parkin writes "DCFS submits the following attachments with explanation of significance..."

Older brother "Tzen reports that father forced him to eat his own vomit if he could not keep food down at the table (two pages). and "...tell me to make sure that the children eat up what they had vomited...."

Why would the mother Wang ask for joint legal and physical custody in Sep 2006 if these fantasies are true?  Wang was represented by counsel Cynthia de Petris from Jan 2005 until Oct 2009 after the kidnapping and again from July 2011 until Jan 2013 (see attached sub form).  

SUB OF ATTORNEY for Yuxin Mei Wang by ko_andrew9963 on Scribd

If the children have been abused for a "long time" wouldn't an aggressive attorney like de Petris immediatly bring this up to Judge Scott Gordon, or Judge Beaudet or Judge Broadbelt?  Why wait unitl September 2016 to bring it up?

In December 2010, the Subordinate Court of Singapore ordered that I be allowed to see the boys since it has been 15 months since they were taken.  I was given 2 hours a day over 8 days to visit with the boys in Singapore.

During the 4th Visit, the boys brought up being fed vomit.  When asked when it happened, they said when they were 2 years old.  The monitor for the visit thought it was recently when they were still in the US.  Besides the fact that it never happened, can both boys have the exact same recollection of an event from 2 years old?

See the appended "4th Visit Update" from Dec18 2010.  There are more of these updates under "Father's Blog" at www.bringthetwinshome.com 

I documented the conversation with the monitor below that it is very easy for Wang to just say "Do you remember your Dad used to feed you vomit?"  Or when we were still in the US, Wang would say "Why does he call so much" when I call to speak with the boys before they went to bed.  Then the boys would say to me "can  you not call so much?"  I call twice a day as agreed in a stipulation.

So Parkin, do you just write down whatever is said to you or given to you?  THINK! 

All the previous CSW's who worked on prior allegations from 2009 like Virginia Avila Bruckmann (and her supevisor), Jana Giles (3/2010) , Marisa Martinez (5/2011), Shawn Rivas(4/2011), Bonnie Franzle (6/2012), Keisha Brown (10/2012), Maryin Quezada (9-11/2016) all didn't know what they were doing and were ALL WRONG in their investigations and conclusions.  

Add to the list of DCFS staff all the San Marino PD officers who were asked by DCFS to assist.  They too were poorly trained and missed what only you found to be "true"?

This is what Parkin seems to be intimating.  When will a real supervisor look into Parkin's unsubstantiated statements that is BIASED against one parent because she thinks she's got it and the other 7 DCFS colleagues didn't.  Not just my case, but prior cases as well.


From: Andrew Ko <ko_andrew@hotmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, December 18, 2010 1:00 AM
To: ko_andrew@hotmail.com
Subject: 4th Visit Update

Hi Everyone,

Today was not so good.  (Mark (De Angelis www.bringseanhome.com) , you are right about feeling like 2 steps forward and 1 step back).

I arrived early as usual to speak with Colin.  I asked him if he spoke with the mother.  he said if there is anything you can do to stop the proceedings in the US that would help.  I said the felony warrants are the result of the mother's actions.  it is not something I can "stop."  He said what about if it is not an issue at one location but it is at another.  I said like the Romanian diplomat Ionescue who got into a traffic accident in Sinapore and fled back to Romania?  Someone broke the law in Singapore and fled.  it is like the mother who broke the law in the US and fled to Singapore.  How do you deal with that?  She needs to surrender and work out a deal for the return of the children.  (FYI: Singapore is taking the position that no laws were broken in Singapore as child abduction is not a crime so no action will be taken on the Interpol Red Notice.  But the reason for the Interpol Red Notice is because US laws were broken.  No one ever said Singapore laws were broken.)

The boys did not respond to any of my questions and ignored me while playing air hockey.  Colin asked me to step into a room while he talked to them.  I can hear him saying something similar to what he did on the 2nd day about responding to me.  I gave the boys the trading cards Michael brought but they just put them aside.

Then I could hear William saying "We don't need him" "he is mean" and "he lies."  After a few minutes, I came out.  I asked William what he meant by "he lies."  He said "we don't need you, we have our Mom" "I told you I don't like to stay with you but you tell people I like it."  I asked who did I tell?  He started crying.  I said "I am your Dad and you are my sons and I love you." Then Christopher said "You are not our Dad."  I responded by saying "who else do you call Dad" and "who took care of you since you were a baby"  At that point, Colin asked me to go back into the room.

I can hear them talking so I opened the door to listen.  Another counselor came by and said I had to close to the door.  I said "I don't think so." But then Colin came back and closed the door.

After about 30-40 min, Colin came in and said he is still trying to get more details about being fed vomit that the children insist they have a recollection of.  He said I made them eat food they didn't like.  I said when they were young, they never said they didn't like certain foods.  Christopher used to vomit at dinner time because he would talk with food in his mounth and the food would go down the wrong pipe.  We would ask the maid to get a new plate of food so he can continue the dinner.  I explained to Colin that in Singapore it is acceptable to eat with your mouth open and talk with food in your mouth but it is not viewed as polite in the US.  It took a few months to explain to Christopher that he is vomiting because he is talking and laughing with his brother. After a few months, it worked.

As to making them eat food they didn't like: I know they don't like brussel sprouts and an asian vegetable called bitter gourd. I would ask them to try it because if you go to someone's home for dinner, you don't want to say you don't like something; you should always try everything.  Colin said he understood that is to teach them manners but how they perceived it is another issue.

I asked Colin to if we can all talk and address each issue that they boys brought up.  I would like to find out why Chirstopher doesn't think I am their father.  Colin said "this is not the time."  Well, someone has been telling the boys for 15 months that I am not their father and it is not the time to correct that?  I said to Colin, if a child spits on the street do you wait until he spits 5 more times before you correct him because "it is not the right time"?  I said someone has told the boys I am not their father and I can't say anything?

He went back out to talk to the boys.  At about 3PM, Colin came in to get me to speak with the boys.  We started with the vomit bit.  When asked how old they were William answered "2 years old."  They said I fed them vomit rather than food.  I explained what actually happened but they refused to acknowledge.  I told Colin later it is very simple for the mother to say "Do you remember when your Dad fed you vomit."  I asked Colin why she didn't report me.  Colin also at first thought the events happened in the US.  

Next, we talked about punishment. I asked Christopher if he remembers the last time he was punished?  He said it was during a Chinese lesson.  I said it was when he rode his bike to a friend's house when I told the boys not to go.  They were out of town.  William did not go but Christopher rode off without telling anyone.  Colin asked if he remembered that and he said yes.

Then we spoke about William's comment that I lie.  I asked him who did I tell about you like to live with me.  He said a cousin or Aunt showed them a website where I posted it.  I said that is probably the Orange County Register article.  Then he said there was "a video and everything, it was international."  I said you did like to stay with me and his answer was "we were faking it because we were afraid."

I asked Colin afterwards if the children are faking it now or faking it then and how do you tell the difference.  I said to Colin, I bet what the mother told you about me before I met you mirrors what the children are telling you.  He didn't answer but his body language said "yes."  Do you think this could be an orchestrated event?

 Then it was 3.15 and it ended.  We try again on Monday at noon but it doesn't look like the time for an independent outing is going to take place.

From: ko_andrew@hotmail.com
To: ko_andrew@hotmail.com
Subject: 3rd Visit Update
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 13:45:35 +0000

Hi All,

We had a good visit today.  The boys actually arrived early.  The sat at the same place as yesterday. Christopher played with his PSP and William on the computer game.   I had a digital recorder and played a recording of them playing the piano and singing in 2009.  They no longer take piano lessons.  Christopher was withdrawn and stuck to playing with  his PSP video game.  I moved close to William again and asked him a few questions.  I told the boys MaMa (Grandma) loves them a lot and misses them a lot.  I said "She told me to give you boys a big kiss and hug when I see you" but there was no response.  I touched William on the arm and said "what do you think" but he didn't say anything.

Colin the counselor had a chat with the boys about respect for adults and manners.  He told them they should answer when I ask them a question and ignoring me is rude.  It seemed to work.

After their chat, the boys started to answer with one or 2 words when i ask them a question.  William was more open to interacting with me.  He and I played indoor soccer and basketball.  We kicked the ball to eachother and then I retrieved the ball for his free throws. Christopher would play with William but won't play with me alone.  I held out my arms in a circle and they used it as a basketball hoop; taking turns dunking the ball.

Michael was outside and could see a bit through the tinted windows. Then he moved to the other side where the windows were not tinted.  I moved the "basketball hoop" closer to this window and Michael could see the boys from the street.  I asked William to look and he saw Uncle Michael.

They played some air hockey and the PSP together.  When I moved close to them, Christopher would get up and leave then William would follow.  We played darts and I kept score for them.

Boys would not answer a lot of questions about their daily routine.  I did manage to find out they get to school for assembly at 7am and wake up at 6.20am.  Favorite subject is math so I told them I was the one who enrolled them in Kumon when they were 3 years old to start math.  I asked them if they ride bikes and whether they remembered I taught them how to ride a bike at our Chapman Woods home in Pasadena. 

The boys still refused to take the books I bought for them.  I asked them if they are afraid of anything and they said "no."  The 2 hours went by very fast.  Michael saw the mother when she came to pick up the boys.  She did not say anything.  We see eachother on Saturday and then on Monday before the outing on Tuesday when I can take them out for 6 hours.  I hope this actually happens.  One day at a time.  Thank you all for your supportive emails and prayers.


From: ko_andrew@hotmail.com
To: ko_andrew@hotmail.com
Subject: 2nd Visit Update
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 14:31:08 +0000

Hi All,

I had my second visit with the boys today.  It was much better than yesterday.  I arrived about 40 minutes early and had a chance to speak with Colin the "Assistant Senior Counselor" at the Center for Family Harmony.  I forwarded a couple of newspaper articles from the Singapore Straits Times on the mother being a wanted fugitive and how the High Court rejected the mother's appeal and told her she should return to the US to sort things out.

I asked him if he could participate a bit more than yesterday and make it a 3-way conversation.  if I ask the boys a question like "what did you have for lunch today" and they don't answer, could Colin follow up by saying "so what did you have for lunch today" to try and draw them out.  He said he will try.   Colin asked me if I could tell the boys why I am there and how long I am going to be in Singapore.  I guess the mother might have told the boys that I am there to take them back to the US.

I could hear the boys arriving about 3.30.  I didn't hear any crying and within a few minutes I was asked to join them.  Christopher was seated next to William and playing with his PSP video game.  William was on the computer playing a game.  I sat behind them and starting talking.  I told them I really missed them and that is why I am there to visit them.  I am only going to be here for 3 weeks, leaving on Jan1 and so we should make the most of the time we  have together.  I repeated this a couple of more times.

I touched the boys on the head.  Christopher tried to swat my hand away but William just shrugged his shoulders.  They answered questions with a few words.  I then pulled myself next to William and looked over his shoulder to see how he is playing the computer game.  He allowed me to get within inches of his face.  I asked him if he is still ticklish and poked him on the side.  He seem to allow me and didn't say anything, just moved a bit to get away from my finger.

I brought a couple of books (How to Train Your Dragon) and Lego Bionicles.  They looked at them but didn't pick them up.  We played a game of Fussball together.  They avoided direct eye contact with me but when they were playing with eachother, they would sneak a peak at me.  Then the boys kicked a ball around, ran, played imaginery basketball, air hockey, and finally Battleship.  I sat down next to them when they were playing.  I asked them about Mama, Aunty Frances, Uncle Michael, Candice and whether they remembered them.  They answered "no" but looked at the photos I brought along.  I told them Aunty Frances has their Christmas presents from last Christmas and will save them along with this year's.

Then it was 5.30 and time for them to go.  Chris got up last.  I told him "Dad loves you very much and see you tomorrow."  He then got up and walked to the door.

Hopefully tomorrow will be the same or better.  They can see that I am the same person who loved and cared for them that they said goodbye to in August last year.  I am sure they have heard a lot of "Dad bashing" and hopefully can now see that I am the same person they knew before.  Tomorrow is another visit and then Saturday. 

Thursday 20 April 2017


The latest "Last Minute Information for the Court" by CSW Christie Parkin and approved by SCSW Holly Bruce contains even more false statements.  Please see attached.

How many more false statement can she put into reports before a supervisor takes notice and asks her to prove the statements are true.

On an earlier JDX report, Parkin wrote "father won't share insurance information with mother."  Did mother ask?  Did someone ask?  How and when?  Where is the Txt or note or what?

How can Parkin be allowed to put unsubstantiated statements that are blatantly false into reports to sway the reader and affect parents and guardians  without any consequence?

The case file for our case is now public since it was filed as evidence in a probate case in Superior Court and by the mother in Singapore for her claim for community property in an annulled bigamous marriage; so it possible to use the statements as evidence without need for WIC 827 approval.

And how can CSW Parkin refer to an 8 year old Child Custody Evaluation report from 2009 as valid?  Parkin included 5 pages and put "Ms. Manger recommended that mother Mei be granted primary physical custody" and "This report is also significant...."  She told me on Jan25 that Dr. Childress' diagnosis is old (from 2012) but a 2009 760 eval is "current."

The evaluator Ms. Manger has already testified in Family Court in 2011 that the report is no longer valid due to the mother's actions in kidnapping the children.  Recently, I communicated with Ms. Manger and told her about Parkin's statement and she said "the evaluation is outdated and you need to have a new evaluation."

Shouldn't CSW Parkin know that ?  Why is she referring to stale reports that even the evaluator/author said it is not valid?

She calls Dr. Childress' diagnosis "biased."  Not sure what she called Dr. de Brito's or Dr. Northrup's but they didn't have what she was looking for.