The latest "Last Minute Information for the Court" by CSW Christie Parkin and approved by SCSW Holly Bruce contains even more false statements. Please see attached.
How many more false statement can she put into reports before a supervisor takes notice and asks her to prove the statements are true.
On an earlier JDX report, Parkin wrote "father won't share insurance information with mother." Did mother ask? Did someone ask? How and when? Where is the Txt or note or what?
How can Parkin be allowed to put unsubstantiated statements that are blatantly false into reports to sway the reader and affect parents and guardians without any consequence?
The case file for our case is now public since it was filed as evidence in a probate case in Superior Court and by the mother in Singapore for her claim for community property in an annulled bigamous marriage; so it possible to use the statements as evidence without need for WIC 827 approval.
And how can CSW Parkin refer to an 8 year old Child Custody Evaluation report from 2009 as valid? Parkin included 5 pages and put "Ms. Manger recommended that mother Mei be granted primary physical custody" and "This report is also significant...." She told me on Jan25 that Dr. Childress' diagnosis is old (from 2012) but a 2009 760 eval is "current."
The evaluator Ms. Manger has already testified in Family Court in 2011 that the report is no longer valid due to the mother's actions in kidnapping the children. Recently, I communicated with Ms. Manger and told her about Parkin's statement and she said "the evaluation is outdated and you need to have a new evaluation."
Shouldn't CSW Parkin know that ? Why is she referring to stale reports that even the evaluator/author said it is not valid?
She calls Dr. Childress' diagnosis "biased." Not sure what she called Dr. de Brito's or Dr. Northrup's but they didn't have what she was looking for.
No comments:
Post a Comment