Chapter 2 WHY NOW?
In September, 2016, we were all at a loss as to why the twins had such an abrupt change in behavior over a 2-3 day period. The "breech" that tends to last a few days became more hostile and angry as the weeks went on.
I had a thought about the reason but couldn't be sure.
What has been happening since September, 2016 goes back to the kidnapping of Christopher and William Ko to Singapore. Interpol and the FBI issued warrants and Red Notice to help bring the boys back.
The mother returned to the US after the boys came back. She was prosecuted and convicted of a felony. Then in July 2012, Dept of Homeland Security ICE served for with a Notice to Appear for immigration fraud (follow link). I didn't know when I married her that she was not divorced. She told everyone she was divorced but it turned out not to be true.
In July, 2016 we were in Family Court for a hearing on requests by the mother for the Court to allow her un-monitored visitations with the boys or reduce the number of monitors, and to attend functions at the school. The Judge denied the requests which were the same requests she made in Aug 2015, a year earlier. The order (follow link) shows again that her requests were denied.
THINK! WHY: the Judge would keep the safeguards in place to protect the boys. The Judge didn't want mother to have contact with the children at school functions as it would be like un-monitored visitation, did not want to reduce the number of monitors, and did not allow monitored visitations outside of a secure center. She remains a "re-abduction risk." She could have terminated monitored visitation by working with the therapist but she refused. It is better to keep the image of a victim and I am sure Mom told the boys it was all my doing.
The hearing in July, 2016 was interesting in that the mother's lawyer shared a lot of information about the next immigration court hearing scheduled for Sep 2016. In the attached Transcript mother's lawyer seemed very sure that her next immigration court hearing on Sep15, 2016 would result in another continuance and this time for 2 years.
After the boys' behavior changed, I suspected something must have happened at the Sep15th hearing since their Note to me about leaving at 18 was written on Sep18th.
In August, 2014 the Family Court issued an order that prohibited the mother from communicating with the boys outside of monitored visitation. This was because a few months earlier, she told the boys she didn't like their therapist and that he was "mean" to her. This caused the boys to pretty much stop participating in therapy.
As in the past, court orders do not apply to the boys' mother. She refused to serve an order issued to protect the children on the Singapore Consulate since Dec2011. She claims she has done it; but the truth is she has not. She sent Facebook messages to the boys (follow link) asking them to hide it from me, and discussing the Family Court proceedings with William. See sample of Facebook messages. Based on this history of secret communication, it is not too far a guess to say that the mother continued to communicate with the boys outside of the Court Order's restrictions.
Sometime around the end of September, I received information that the immigration case was NOT continued for 2 years. Instead it was continued for only 4 months until January 25, 2017. I immediately suspected the mother went and told the boys something about what happened at the Sep15th immigration court hearing and how she needs them to live with her or she will be deported.
In the appended email below dated Oct24, 2016 I asked the mother if that is what she is doing and she responded with "You are crazy. Really crazy person"
Well, it is starting to happen. The boys were desparate to go live with their mother. This was documented by San Marino PD and DCFS social workers multiple times between September to November, 2016. Her plan to ask for a cancellation or waiver for immigration fraud based on 'hardship' rests on the boys being with her. Mother called DCFS, Principal Mary Johnson called DCFS.
Not so crazy afterall because on Jan25, the oldest stepson flew in from Australia and along with Christopher and William went before the immigration judge to plead hardship. They repeated the same lies that the boys told me in December, 2010 when I went to Singapore to visit them: that they were being abused. But there were no calls to DCFS or allegations of abuse in Family Court from March 2011 till Sep 2016. If there were, the Family Court would immediately investigated and terminated my sole legal and physical custody if allegations were true. But Mother NEVER brought this point out, even in 2 ex parte hearings.
The mother was supposed to go to Family Court to ask for a change in custody and the boys were planning on requesting emancipation. 2 pages from Chris' calendar show "ask Johnson for help" and "Johnson emancipation." It would be safe to assume Mary Johnson is the Johnson Chris is talking to for help on emancipation. So how much of Ms. Johnson's statements and emails are to help the boys emancipate??? A San Marino HS Principal's job scope includes helping students emancipate (and break up a family)?
Did the school principal and the school psychologist interview the friends they eat lunch with for the past 2 school years? Teddy, Brian, etc and ask how many times the boys didn't bring lunch to school? They stopped bringing lunch to school in Oct/Nov 2016 in order to set-up the case that their father doesn't feed them, i.e. abuse them. Ask any of their friends and parents who have been to our house or mountain cabin whether the boys look like they were abused or had food withheld from them. And Mrs. Johnson and Ms. Guerrero bought it completely. They should have done their homework.
In the English Essay titled "RUN" by Christopher Ko to Mrs. John's Honors English Class in April 2016. Was Mrs. Johns alarmed by the essay, did she report the incident to Mrs. Johnson or call the police? No because she probably didn't see any signs that concerned her.
And remember, the boys went through Valentine, Huntington and SMHS , Summer school, summer tennis at SMHS, and YMCA summer camps with so many teachers, counselors, and nurse. None of them saw any signs of abuse from March 2011 to Sep 2016 except for Mrs. Johnson and Natalie Guerrero. Just like DCFS, half a dozen social workers visited us in 2011 and 2012 on false allegations of abuse reported by their mother; all of them missed signs of abuse except for the last one in December 2016 and a report writer named Christie Parkin. And 3 mental health professionals (PhD, MD, Psy D), a Minor's Counsel who met the boys regularly, and 3 Family Court judges; they all missed it. The odds are low.
And the calendar for Oct3 is to talk to social worker and ask about "filing for custody change." A DCFS social worker's job scope includes helping children emancipate and how to file for a change in custody?
Both emancipation and change in custody are not happening fast enough for boys and mother; and January 25th is fast approaching. I suspect the boys were worried that it is now December and the immigration court hearing is January 25th.
So on Dec3, 2016, the boys provoked and physically assaulted me to create a situation that would ensure they are removed from my home. Afterall, the DCFS social worker Maryin Quezada told the boys during her last visit to our home on Oct26 afternoon that she does not have enough evidence to take them into protective custody/foster care. And if she did, she said it would take 12-18 months and it would be out in Lancaster as there are no foster homes in San Marino or San Gabriel areas.
So the boys made sure there is enough evidence this time to make it happen. They were successful. I was told the boys don't talk about what happend with their friends at school. Why not? If you have been abused for the last 5 years, one would have PTSD and best way to handle PTSD is to talk about it. Talking would mean making up more stories that can support their case.
At the January 25th immigration court hearing, the Judge set another hearing for March 8th 2017. Again, the boys were paraded in front of the immigration judge on March 8th to help make sure a cancellation or waiver to deportation due to hardship on minor children was granted.
It is pretty "heady" when your mother asks you for help and if you don't she will be deported. What are the boys to do? Afterall, they have already been "programmed" to reject me and not to show any love and affection towards me as diagnosed by Dr. Northrup and Dr. de Brito.
Without understanding the history of our very complex family dynamics, one would not be able to piece together "Why Now?"
The photos and emails below do not show Christopher and William "in constant fear of their father" nor a father who withholds basice necessities from them. How the San Marino High School psychologist Natalie Guerrero and principal Mary Johnson can write and speak such falsehoods is beyond me. Follow links: Photo 1. Photo 2. Photo 3.
Why would an abusive father send Chris to Ohio for a Drum Line competition? Why would an abusive father send both twins to Taiwan for 6 weeks and give them money to enjoy themselves? Why would an abusive father take the boys around the world for vacations? And skiing in Whistler and crabbing on the Puget Sound? Why would he ask which ACT and AP prep books they want or suggest tennis rackets for their birthday presents? (See emails below).
According to what their mother told the District Attorney, the boys had no choice but to go on family vacations because they can't be left at home alone. Who is Krista Watson then? She would come stay with the boys when school schedule did not allow the boys to accompany us on vacation. How many parents plan family vacations and allow their children to not participate?
And the mother also told the DA the boys were "forced" to call me everyday from Taiwan and tell me they loved me; OR ELSE they would have to come home early. Really? They were gone from July 4 to Aug 13, 40 days in total. In the Chris' and William's phone records, does it look like they called every day? More like once a week. So did they come home early? NO, they completed the entire 6 week program.
Why isn't this considered lying? Who made it up? Boys or mother?
In November, 2009, the mother filed the sworn Affidavits under oath in Singapore that said on paragraph 12 and paragraph 10 in the second Affidavit that she took (kidnapped) the boys to Singapore to "find the real father of her children." But now she is telling social workers at DCFS that she took the boys to Singapore because I was abusing them and kidnapping them to Singapore is the only way to stop it. Another lie.
Since the boys returned in March 2011 through Sep 2016, the mother Mei Wang has taken me back to Family Court 7 times. Not once did she accuse me of abuse or child endangerment. That is why 3 judges kept the custody arrangements in place to protect the twins. Only starting in Sep 2016 did allegations of abuse and neglect started being called in to DCFS.
In other Singapore Affidavits there were "conflicting statements." Ms. Wang again swears in Dec 2009, paragraph 21 that she kidnapped the boys to Singapore to find the real father of the children. Now, look at paragraph 24 where she states she "endured countless pain and suffering" for the past 9 years. Compare this to paragraph 10 in the next sworn Affidavit from June 15, 2015 where she now states "For most of the marriage, we had a close and loving relationship." Why the 180-degree change? In 2015, you will see at the beginning of the Affidavit that she is suing for community property and wanted half of my apartment in Singapore so she wanted to paint a picture of a loving marriage. As the therapist said back in 2012:
Dr. Childress May2012 Quote by on Scribd
Next Chapter 3: Where and How. We will go back to August 2009 and document the events leading up to the boys' disappearance and ask the readers how they would feel if it was their children, nephews or children of family friends who were kidnapped.
In September, 2016, we were all at a loss as to why the twins had such an abrupt change in behavior over a 2-3 day period. The "breech" that tends to last a few days became more hostile and angry as the weeks went on.
I had a thought about the reason but couldn't be sure.
What has been happening since September, 2016 goes back to the kidnapping of Christopher and William Ko to Singapore. Interpol and the FBI issued warrants and Red Notice to help bring the boys back.
The mother returned to the US after the boys came back. She was prosecuted and convicted of a felony. Then in July 2012, Dept of Homeland Security ICE served for with a Notice to Appear for immigration fraud (follow link). I didn't know when I married her that she was not divorced. She told everyone she was divorced but it turned out not to be true.
In July, 2016 we were in Family Court for a hearing on requests by the mother for the Court to allow her un-monitored visitations with the boys or reduce the number of monitors, and to attend functions at the school. The Judge denied the requests which were the same requests she made in Aug 2015, a year earlier. The order (follow link) shows again that her requests were denied.
THINK! WHY: the Judge would keep the safeguards in place to protect the boys. The Judge didn't want mother to have contact with the children at school functions as it would be like un-monitored visitation, did not want to reduce the number of monitors, and did not allow monitored visitations outside of a secure center. She remains a "re-abduction risk." She could have terminated monitored visitation by working with the therapist but she refused. It is better to keep the image of a victim and I am sure Mom told the boys it was all my doing.
The hearing in July, 2016 was interesting in that the mother's lawyer shared a lot of information about the next immigration court hearing scheduled for Sep 2016. In the attached Transcript mother's lawyer seemed very sure that her next immigration court hearing on Sep15, 2016 would result in another continuance and this time for 2 years.
After the boys' behavior changed, I suspected something must have happened at the Sep15th hearing since their Note to me about leaving at 18 was written on Sep18th.
In August, 2014 the Family Court issued an order that prohibited the mother from communicating with the boys outside of monitored visitation. This was because a few months earlier, she told the boys she didn't like their therapist and that he was "mean" to her. This caused the boys to pretty much stop participating in therapy.
As in the past, court orders do not apply to the boys' mother. She refused to serve an order issued to protect the children on the Singapore Consulate since Dec2011. She claims she has done it; but the truth is she has not. She sent Facebook messages to the boys (follow link) asking them to hide it from me, and discussing the Family Court proceedings with William. See sample of Facebook messages. Based on this history of secret communication, it is not too far a guess to say that the mother continued to communicate with the boys outside of the Court Order's restrictions.
At a July 20th, 2016 hearing, mother's lawyer Mr. Pease shared with me that she is now changing her plea in immigration court to one of 'extreme and unusual hardship' on her minor children if she is deported. It sounded strange to me then because she only has monitored visitation twice a month so how can it be a hardship? Hardship would only be true if the boys actually lived with her and she supported them. It didn't mean anything to me back in July, but when the boys' behavior suddenly changed (and continued for months) with their urgency to emancipate and go live with their mother, it became clearer.
Sometime around the end of September, I received information that the immigration case was NOT continued for 2 years. Instead it was continued for only 4 months until January 25, 2017. I immediately suspected the mother went and told the boys something about what happened at the Sep15th immigration court hearing and how she needs them to live with her or she will be deported.
In the appended email below dated Oct24, 2016 I asked the mother if that is what she is doing and she responded with "You are crazy. Really crazy person"
Well, it is starting to happen. The boys were desparate to go live with their mother. This was documented by San Marino PD and DCFS social workers multiple times between September to November, 2016. Her plan to ask for a cancellation or waiver for immigration fraud based on 'hardship' rests on the boys being with her. Mother called DCFS, Principal Mary Johnson called DCFS.
Not so crazy afterall because on Jan25, the oldest stepson flew in from Australia and along with Christopher and William went before the immigration judge to plead hardship. They repeated the same lies that the boys told me in December, 2010 when I went to Singapore to visit them: that they were being abused. But there were no calls to DCFS or allegations of abuse in Family Court from March 2011 till Sep 2016. If there were, the Family Court would immediately investigated and terminated my sole legal and physical custody if allegations were true. But Mother NEVER brought this point out, even in 2 ex parte hearings.
The mother was supposed to go to Family Court to ask for a change in custody and the boys were planning on requesting emancipation. 2 pages from Chris' calendar show "ask Johnson for help" and "Johnson emancipation." It would be safe to assume Mary Johnson is the Johnson Chris is talking to for help on emancipation. So how much of Ms. Johnson's statements and emails are to help the boys emancipate??? A San Marino HS Principal's job scope includes helping students emancipate (and break up a family)?
Did the school principal and the school psychologist interview the friends they eat lunch with for the past 2 school years? Teddy, Brian, etc and ask how many times the boys didn't bring lunch to school? They stopped bringing lunch to school in Oct/Nov 2016 in order to set-up the case that their father doesn't feed them, i.e. abuse them. Ask any of their friends and parents who have been to our house or mountain cabin whether the boys look like they were abused or had food withheld from them. And Mrs. Johnson and Ms. Guerrero bought it completely. They should have done their homework.
In the English Essay titled "RUN" by Christopher Ko to Mrs. John's Honors English Class in April 2016. Was Mrs. Johns alarmed by the essay, did she report the incident to Mrs. Johnson or call the police? No because she probably didn't see any signs that concerned her.
And remember, the boys went through Valentine, Huntington and SMHS , Summer school, summer tennis at SMHS, and YMCA summer camps with so many teachers, counselors, and nurse. None of them saw any signs of abuse from March 2011 to Sep 2016 except for Mrs. Johnson and Natalie Guerrero. Just like DCFS, half a dozen social workers visited us in 2011 and 2012 on false allegations of abuse reported by their mother; all of them missed signs of abuse except for the last one in December 2016 and a report writer named Christie Parkin. And 3 mental health professionals (PhD, MD, Psy D), a Minor's Counsel who met the boys regularly, and 3 Family Court judges; they all missed it. The odds are low.
And the calendar for Oct3 is to talk to social worker and ask about "filing for custody change." A DCFS social worker's job scope includes helping children emancipate and how to file for a change in custody?
Both emancipation and change in custody are not happening fast enough for boys and mother; and January 25th is fast approaching. I suspect the boys were worried that it is now December and the immigration court hearing is January 25th.
So on Dec3, 2016, the boys provoked and physically assaulted me to create a situation that would ensure they are removed from my home. Afterall, the DCFS social worker Maryin Quezada told the boys during her last visit to our home on Oct26 afternoon that she does not have enough evidence to take them into protective custody/foster care. And if she did, she said it would take 12-18 months and it would be out in Lancaster as there are no foster homes in San Marino or San Gabriel areas.
So the boys made sure there is enough evidence this time to make it happen. They were successful. I was told the boys don't talk about what happend with their friends at school. Why not? If you have been abused for the last 5 years, one would have PTSD and best way to handle PTSD is to talk about it. Talking would mean making up more stories that can support their case.
At the January 25th immigration court hearing, the Judge set another hearing for March 8th 2017. Again, the boys were paraded in front of the immigration judge on March 8th to help make sure a cancellation or waiver to deportation due to hardship on minor children was granted.
It is pretty "heady" when your mother asks you for help and if you don't she will be deported. What are the boys to do? Afterall, they have already been "programmed" to reject me and not to show any love and affection towards me as diagnosed by Dr. Northrup and Dr. de Brito.
Without understanding the history of our very complex family dynamics, one would not be able to piece together "Why Now?"
The photos and emails below do not show Christopher and William "in constant fear of their father" nor a father who withholds basice necessities from them. How the San Marino High School psychologist Natalie Guerrero and principal Mary Johnson can write and speak such falsehoods is beyond me. Follow links: Photo 1. Photo 2. Photo 3.
Why would an abusive father send Chris to Ohio for a Drum Line competition? Why would an abusive father send both twins to Taiwan for 6 weeks and give them money to enjoy themselves? Why would an abusive father take the boys around the world for vacations? And skiing in Whistler and crabbing on the Puget Sound? Why would he ask which ACT and AP prep books they want or suggest tennis rackets for their birthday presents? (See emails below).
According to what their mother told the District Attorney, the boys had no choice but to go on family vacations because they can't be left at home alone. Who is Krista Watson then? She would come stay with the boys when school schedule did not allow the boys to accompany us on vacation. How many parents plan family vacations and allow their children to not participate?
And the mother also told the DA the boys were "forced" to call me everyday from Taiwan and tell me they loved me; OR ELSE they would have to come home early. Really? They were gone from July 4 to Aug 13, 40 days in total. In the Chris' and William's phone records, does it look like they called every day? More like once a week. So did they come home early? NO, they completed the entire 6 week program.
Why isn't this considered lying? Who made it up? Boys or mother?
In November, 2009, the mother filed the sworn Affidavits under oath in Singapore that said on paragraph 12 and paragraph 10 in the second Affidavit that she took (kidnapped) the boys to Singapore to "find the real father of her children." But now she is telling social workers at DCFS that she took the boys to Singapore because I was abusing them and kidnapping them to Singapore is the only way to stop it. Another lie.
Since the boys returned in March 2011 through Sep 2016, the mother Mei Wang has taken me back to Family Court 7 times. Not once did she accuse me of abuse or child endangerment. That is why 3 judges kept the custody arrangements in place to protect the twins. Only starting in Sep 2016 did allegations of abuse and neglect started being called in to DCFS.
Dr. Childress May2012 Quote by on Scribd
Next Chapter 3: Where and How. We will go back to August 2009 and document the events leading up to the boys' disappearance and ask the readers how they would feel if it was their children, nephews or children of family friends who were kidnapped.
From: Mei Wong
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2016 2:44 PM
To: Andrew Ko
Subject: Re: Extreme and Unusual Hardship
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2016 2:44 PM
To: Andrew Ko
Subject: Re: Extreme and Unusual Hardship
You are crazy. Really crazy person
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 1:58 PM, Andrew Ko <ko_andrew@hotmail.com> wrote:
Why the sudden urgency to have the boys live with you? You didn't ask for the last 2 years? Maybe it is what Ed Pease said in Court that you are now claiming hardship on your children in immigration court. And how you communicated it to the boys will come out.
From: William Ko
Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2016 10:07 PM
To: Andrew Ko
Subject: ACT/Summer Courses
Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2016 10:07 PM
To: Andrew Ko
Subject: ACT/Summer Courses
These are the act books and prep books that I have chosen. There are multiple act books because each one teaches different things. One teaches strategies, another is practice problems, and the other is study material.
ACT:
Junior Year Prep(AP BOOKS):
AP LANGUAGE
AP PHYSICS
From: William Ko
Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 8:31 PM
To: Andrew Ko
Subject: Re: Birthday Tennis Racquet
Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 8:31 PM
To: Andrew Ko
Subject: Re: Birthday Tennis Racquet
Hello Dad,
Thank you for the birthday gift suggestion. I have selected this one: http://www.midwestsports.com/babolat-aeropro-drive-tennis-racquet/p/101174/
Information Regarding Specifications:
Strung: Babolat Rpm Blast 16g
I'm not sure what the tension is. If I recall you said that the lady mentioned a certain one
Thanks
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 12:39 PM, Andrew Ko <ko_andrew@hotmail.com> wrote:
Take a look at these Babolat specials http://www.midwestsports.com/tennis-racquet-specials/c/32/filter/100000001884eq100000001893and100000002137eq100000002140/
No comments:
Post a Comment